M A Y / J U N E 2 0 1 7 14 POTATO GROWER Table 1. Agronomic and quality assessments for advancing chip processing selections and cultivars, Hoople, ND, 2016. Clone Stand % Vine Size1 Vine Matur- ity2 Stems per Plant Tuber No. per Plant Shatter Bruise3 Black- spot Bruise4 General Rating5 1. ND7519-1 95 3.8 3.0 1.9 6.6 2.6 2.3 3.9 2. ND7818-1Y 91 2.8 1.1 1.9 8.4 2.3 2.0 3.0 3. ND7799c-1 94 4.8 4.0 1.6 5.7 2.5 1.1 4.0 4. ND8304-2 94 2.5 2.1 2.1 6.3 2.9 2.8 2.9 5. ND8305-1 98 3.5 4.0 2.8 8.0 2.9 1.7 2.4 6. ND8331Cb-2 98 3.8 3.0 2.3 7.5 2.1 2.6 2.8 7. ND092018C-2 93 2.8 4.0 2.1 10.0 3.0 2.6 2.3 8. ND102631AB-1 96 3.0 1.1 2.0 7.5 2.5 1.7 3.4 9. ND102917C-1 91 3.5 3.0 1.8 5.3 3.1 2.4 3.9 10. ND102922C-3 98 2.3 2.4 2.6 10.8 2.4 2.3 2.5 11. ND113030C-1 96 4.5 4.0 1.8 7.7 2.7 3.1 3.3 12. ND113060-1 69 2.5 3.3 2.2 8.3 2.0 3.4 3.0 13. ND113289C-1 94 3.0 2.6 1.6 7.0 2.1 1.5 3.4 14. ND113386Ab-5 91 3.8 3.3 1.5 5.5 3.1 1.8 3.8 15. ND113394CAB-2 96 4.3 4.0 2.6 10.0 2.4 2.2 3.4 16. Atlantic 96 4.3 3.8 1.7 6.7 2.7 2.1 4.0 17. Dakota Crisp 96 3.8 3.8 1.9 7.1 2.3 2.3 4.1 18. Dakota Diamond 91 5.0 4.0 1.9 6.4 2.0 2.9 3.9 19. Dakota Pearl 98 3.8 3.5 1.8 6.2 2.6 1.1 3.9 20. Ivory Crisp 93 4.8 4.0 2.5 6.3 3.0 1.4 3.8 21. Lamoka 95 4.5 4.0 1.9 6.0 2.5 3.1 4.0 22. NorValley 99 3.5 3.5 2.5 7.2 3.5 2.4 3.0 23. Snowden 100 4.3 4.0 2.3 6.7 2.3 3.5 3.5 24. Waneta 93 3.8 3.8 1.0 5.0 1.8 1.1 4.0 Mean 94 3.7 3.3 2.0 7.2 2.5 2.2 3.4 LSD (=0.05) 9 0.8 0.6 0.4 1.5 0.7 0.8 0.5 1 Vine size – scale 1-5, 1 = small, 5 = large. 2 Vine maturity – scale 1-5, 1 = early, 5 = late. 3 Shatter bruise – scale 1-5, 1= none; 5 = severe. 4 Blackspot bruise determined by the abrasive peel method, scale 1-5, 1=none, 5=severe. 5 General rating based on yield, appearance, tuber size profile, shape, set, defects; scale of 1 to 5; 1 = poor, 5 = excellent (perfect).